Gustaw Fit Blog

Your are unique lovely people. Read my blog for why.



In many posts – please scroll below Polish version to get to English version or vice-versa (not a rule!)
W wielu postach – proszę przewinąć w dół pod wersją polską, aby dotrzeć do wersji angielskiej lub odwrotnie (nie jest to reguła!)

So, you’ve decided to upgrade your OCR engine. You’re currently rocking Tesseract 3.02—a version so old it probably remembers when people actually liked the Star Wars prequels—and you want to leap into the glorious, neural-network-fueled arms of Tesseract 5.

It sounds like a great idea on paper. “It’s faster!” they say. “It uses LSTM!” they cry. But if your production environment is running on a version of Perl that qualifies for a senior citizen discount, you aren’t just looking at an “upgrade.” You’re looking at a digital archaeological disaster.

The “Pain” in Pain Points: What Changed

The jump from Tesseract 3 to 5 isn’t just a version number increase; it’s a complete paradigm shift. Tesseract 3 used a “Legacy” engine based on character pattern recognition. Tesseract 5 defaults to LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), which is fancy talk for “I use artificial intelligence to guess what this smudge is.”

1. The Death of the “Legacy” Engine

If your Perl script relies on specific Tesseract 3 behaviors—like font name detection—you’re out of luck. Version 5 doesn’t do that. You can force it into “Legacy Mode” (--oem 0), but only if you have the right tessdata files, which are now hidden in different repositories like a secret level in a 90s RPG.

2. The Leptonica Dependency Hell

Tesseract 5 requires Leptonica 1.74+. If your server is running an “ancient” Perl setup, your OS likely also has a version of zlib or libpng that hasn’t been updated since the last Bush administration. Trying to compile a modern C++ engine on a system where the C compiler thinks std::string is “new-age magic” is a recipe for a very long weekend.

The Rant: Voice from the Abyss

Nothing captures the spirit of this struggle like a developer who has lost their will to live.

(The “Tesseract is a Relic” Guy): > “I’ve done a lot of OCR work and tesseract is nearly a decade out of date at this point. It is not a serious technology for anything requiring good accuracy… You still have to do more training on top of them for anything that isn’t black text on a crisp white background.” — nh2 on Hacker News.

Sources for Your Documentation (and Condolences)

Before you embark on this quest, please consult the following scrolls of wisdom:

  1. Tesseract 5.0 Release Notes: Witness the “modernization” of C++ code that will make your ancient compiler weep.
  2. Perl Monks: Upgrading Legacy Codebases: A sobering guide on why your hashes are now random and your life is now harder.
  3. Tesseract GitHub README: The official list of dependencies that your server definitely doesn’t have.

Summary: DO I THINK I Should You Do It?

No.

I follow the wisdom of the internet: If Perl is ancient, keep your Tesseract ancient. They understand each other.

But as per usual – the choice is yours!


Leave a comment