The background
For years, I was all-in when it came to technology. I studied telecommunications, worked with big players like Nokia-Siemens, and thrived in high-paced, cutting-edge environments. I genuinely loved what I did—and I still do. But over time, I started making some significant changes. Not because I stopped believing in technology, but because I no longer wanted to use it blindly. I had to learn how to stay passionate about innovation while also being mindful of how it affects my life and the lives of those I love. And likely many more people.
We’re told we’re in the middle of a “green revolution.” We’re saving the planet with electric cars, bamboo toothbrushes, and solar-powered garden gnomes. But behind the PR-friendly headlines, we’re building a planetary nervous system that never sleeps, never stops pulsing—an invisible fog of microwave radiation that now saturates our homes, schools, bedrooms, and bodies 24/7.
We’re planting trees and installing 5G towers next to them. And when the birds stop singing, we call it climate change, as if the only environmental threat is carbon. As if EMFs, flickering LEDs, and synthetic light spectra have no impact on flora, fauna, or us.
So what changed?
A major health crisis hit me and my family. At first, it didn’t make sense. It wasn’t just one symptom, one diagnosis. It was a strange collection of things—fatigue, rashes, joint pains, inability to focus, emotional instability, and a growing sense of something being very wrong beneath the surface (while I was in my mid-twenties!). Most of the tests were fine. On paper, everything looked normal. But I wasn’t. I’d lose concentration for no reason. I had bursts of aggresion that spiraled into depression, followed by waves of guilt for what I have done, that left me emotionally wrecked. And more.
And then, there was the heartbreak of watching my child suffer. And my partner too. When your loved ones are struggling, and no one can give you real answers, it shakes something deep in you.
In medicine, when nothing shows up clearly, you’re often told it’s all in your head. And so the path leads to therapy, often for years, sometimes with little relief. I’ve seen that journey unfold for many. Pills might help in the short term—they can stabilize, take the edge off—but I rarely see them lead to a life filled with vitality, creativity, and joy. Without a crutch. At best, they manage the symptoms. At worst, they mask what the body is really trying to tell us.
I was lucky—really lucky—to find a few good guides and mentors who helped me along the way. People who didn’t promise miracles, who didn’t ask for blind belief, but who held space for me to question, explore, and heal at my own pace. I’ll share more about them later. But the truth is, before I found those people, I wandered through a pretty confusing maze.
Because here’s what no one tells you when you take a turn off the main road: the moment you start looking for different answers, you also enter a world that’s just as full of noise as the one you left behind.
And it’s a strange kind of noise.
On one side, you have the conventional system telling you that what you’re experiencing is “psychosomatic”—just stress, just burnout, just something in your head. It’s a neat little label to close the case. No further investigation needed. On the other side, you enter the world of “alternatives”—where you’re told to believe in crystals, colors, sound baths, vibrations, and all sorts of things that might help, might not. The catch? If they don’t work, it’s not the method—it’s very often because you didn’t believe enough.
So you’re left with a dilemma. One system gaslights you by saying nothing’s wrong. The other asks you to suspend your rational mind and jump headfirst into belief. It’s like your brain is being pulled in two directions and fucked with from both sides. You start wondering, “Is there even a path through this that doesn’t require me to abandon either logic or hope?”
That’s a dark place to sit in. You’re exhausted, desperate, and stuck between stories that don’t really fit you. And that’s why finding grounded, honest people—people who hold both the mystery and the science—is so rare and so necessary.
Healing shouldn’t require blind faith. It should invite curiosity, self-respect, and time. And it should absolutely include the possibility that maybe—just maybe—it’s not only you who’s broken. Maybe it’s the environment, the assumptions, and the invisible forces that we never really learned how to question.
The road
Along the way, I started to discover things that actually work. Not just theories, not just wishful thinking, but tools and practices that are either well-researched or deeply time-tested. Let’s call them what they are: medicine. Not “alternative” medicine, not “complementary” or “integrative.” Just medicine—because they do what medicine is supposed to do. They help. They heal. They restore.
And this was a turning point for me. Because when you’re drowning in a sea of contradictions—one side denying your pain, the other demanding your belief—finding something solid, something measurable, something with evidence behind it, feels like grabbing onto a lifeline. These weren’t miracle cures. They were practical, rooted, and often surprisingly simple interventions that respected both the body’s intelligence and the complexity of healing.
But the real treasure? That was the people.
The mentors who showed up along this path had walked much further—and through much darker terrain—than I had. One had spent months bedridden, unable to move, unable to function. They’d faced choices I didn’t have to. They paid the price for the knowledge they now carry. And I, in a way, got to skip ahead. I benefited from their hard-won wisdom without having to suffer as deeply as they did.
That’s not lost on me. In fact, I carry it with a deep sense of humility. I was lucky. I found the right people at the right time. And in more ways than one, I believe they saved my life. I’ll never be able to fully repay them. But I can say thank you. And I did. And I will repeat with one special thank you here – thank you Paweł.
Now, I want to make something very clear.
I’m not against what some people call conventional medicine. I’m not anti-doctor, anti-pharma, or anti-science. Just like I’m not blindly against alternative methods either. I’ve seen value in both worlds. I’ve seen people saved by surgeries, scans, and prescriptions. I’ve also seen people come back to life through breathwork, nutrition, detox, and touch. What matters to me is whether it works—not where it comes from.
After sharing this background with you, I just want to underline one thing: artificial EMFs are, in my view, the most widespread and underestimated stressor we’re facing today. They are everywhere, and that’s exactly why we tend to ignore them. They don’t shout. They don’t burn. They don’t leave visible marks. And in many ways – we simply can’t shut them down. But they wear us down—slowly, persistently, and deeply.
They stress the body. They limit the energy we have available for regeneration. They interfere with sleep, mood, immune function, and the subtle communications between our cells. They affect not just us as individuals, but the environments we live and work in. They shifted and continue to shift the entire baseline of what we consider “normal.”
That said, I don’t believe EMFs are the only cause of illness. Far from it. There are many other layers to the human story—emotional wounds, trauma, toxic foods, broken relationships, unresolved grief, lack of meaning, even architectural and geopathic stress. Also the more “conventional” ones—surgical conditions, genetical conditions, viral, bacterial nad more. Health is a puzzle with many pieces.
So no, dealing with EMFs won’t magically fix everything. It won’t make you invincible. It won’t guarantee vitality. But here’s the thing I’ve come to believe, with a quiet certainty: if you don’t deal with this layer—if you keep ignoring it—true, lasting healing becomes very, very difficult.
If I were to write down everything I’ve seen and learned on this path, the book would be too thick to carry. So I choose to focus here. On EMFs. Because I believe that in this moment, with the way our lives are wired—literally and figuratively—this is the critical issue. The invisible wall. The background interference that blocks so many other forms of healing from fully landing.
Now what about the evidence?
The evidence
If you read the official statements—from WHO, ICNIRP, or even that article I once contributed to in FOCUS newspaper back in Poland—the recurring phrase is familiar: “There is no conclusive evidence.” It’s the kind of line that sounds definitive, but also oddly dismissive. What’s rarely emphasized, though, is that they have issued warnings—most notably about cancer risk. That alone should give us pause. But it doesn’t seem to.
The deeper I went into this world, the more puzzled I became. Because when you step outside that narrow channel of “official” statements and start digging into what independent scientists, doctors, and researchers are actually finding, the picture looks very different. It’s not a desert of data—it’s a flood. Thousands of studies, spanning decades, many showing measurable biological effects—on DNA, on cells, on the nervous system, on sleep cycles, fertility, mental health. You name it.
And beyond the research, something else caught my attention: the legal victories. People across the world have taken governments, corporations, and telecom giants to court—and won. Cases around work-related illnesses, children developing symptoms at schools near towers, electromagnetic hypersensitivity, and even municipalities being forced to halt or limit 5G rollouts.
If there’s no problem, how do you explain the wins? How do you explain courts—often not known for taking radical stances—siding with individuals who are simply saying: “This made me sick”?
It’s deeply concerning. Because these are not fringe stories. And yet, we don’t see them on the front page of every paper. We don’t hear these cases on the evening news. Instead, we hear about the next gadget, the next network upgrade, the next miracle of speed and convenience. We are being bathed in buy-more-be-happier narrative.
Every now and then, a headline slips through the cracks—like the one about how LED streetlights are harming plants, disorienting insects, or confusing migratory birds. Or how urban wildlife is changing behaviour in response to artificial light. But even those stories are often treated like isolated oddities, not symptoms of a much larger, systemic imbalance.
So yes—it’s puzzling. And it should be. Because when there’s this much smoke, we ought to start asking about the fire.
A friend of mine compared artificial EMFs to a water-drip torture. I agree to an extent, but you likely would know when you are being tortured. Artificial EMFs are worse.
Most of us can’t feel or sense artificial EMFs and will attribute the effects to something else…
human mind is a wonder.
And re the “green revolution” – think how many of our planets resources need to be excavated daily, how many rivers polluted. Every “clean” phone, every “sustainable” smart device, every wireless sensor we install to make our homes “eco-efficient” requires the earth to be carved open. Vast quantities of lithium, cobalt, rare earth metals—torn from the crust of this planet every single day. Mountains reduced to wounds. Rivers poisoned with heavy metals. Indigenous land turned to ghost terrain. And emissions. Loads more than your good old combustion engine. Loads more than 100,000 and more people cities.
And for what?
So that our smart fridge can text us when the almond milk is running low?
So here we go with some more concrete things.
My journey started with one M.D. Robert O. Becker book – The Body Electric. The book is a foundational work that explores how electricity is not just a feature of our nervous system but a vital force in healing and regeneration. Becker’s research revealed that our bodies generate electrical currents during injury and that these currents play a crucial role in tissue repair. He demonstrated that applying specific electrical fields could stimulate regeneration, even in cases where natural healing would not occur. His research is used today to help burn victims skin regenerate.
I can’t remember what came next, so I’ll just start calling out some of the ones that made the most impact on me—or at least the ones I remember right now. Recency bias is real, but I don’t think you’ll be at a loss. Besides, memory is like a bad roommate: it sometimes does not quite work when you need it, but somehow remembers every embarrassing thing you did in 2003. 😅
Another voice that helped shape my understanding was Prof. Fritz-Albert Popp, a biophysicist associated with the Max Planck Institute. His work focused on biophotons—tiny pulses of light emitted by living cells. What he discovered is astonishing: our cells don’t just react to light, they actually use it to communicate, to regulate functions, to maintain balance. Light, in his view, isn’t just something we see—it’s a language of life itself. And when artificial EMFs or unnatural light sources interfere with that language, the body can become confused, disoriented. Popp’s research opened a window into a world where biology and light are inseparable—and where subtle distortions can have very real effects.
One other study that really stayed with me comes from Prof. Olle Johansson of the Karolinska Institutet, along with Dimitris Panagopoulos and George Carlo. Their research highlighted something crucial that most people never hear about: it’s not just the presence of electromagnetic fields that matters—it’s their structure. Natural EMFs, like those from the earth or the sun, are not polarized. Man-made EMFs, however, are highly polarized. That polarization—the artificial, forced alignment of waves—interacts with our biology in ways we are only beginning to understand. The body reacts more strongly, more disruptively, to this unnatural energy. This, they argue, is one of the key reasons artificial EMFs can be biologically active—and potentially harmful—while natural EMFs are not. It’s not just radiation. It’s the kind of radiation, and how alien it is to what we’ve evolved with.
One of the frameworks that helped me make sense of my own healing journey comes from Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt and his concept of the Five Levels of Healing. He suggests that true healing doesn’t happen on just one level—it spans across the physical body, the energy system, the emotional field, the intuitive mind, and the spiritual core. What struck me is how often we get stuck treating just the physical level—symptoms, lab results, diagnoses—while completely overlooking the deeper roots of dysfunction. Klinghardt’s work reminded me that environmental stressors like EMFs may show up first in the body, but they echo through all levels of our being. To truly heal, we have to work across the whole system—and that begins with removing the interferences that are blocking us from restoring that deeper balance.
Another study that expanded my knowledge came from Dimitris Panagopoulos. He compared the damage done to immune system cells—specifically lymphocytes—by two very different stressors: an extreme dose of caffeine (290 times the maximum daily amount recommended for adults) and just a 15-minute mobile phone call using UMTS technology. Shockingly, the mobile phone exposure caused comparable, if not greater, chromosome damage. Even more alarming was the effect when both stressors were combined—the damage wasn’t just additive, it was amplified. This kind of synergy between environmental stressors is something we rarely consider, but it’s real.
And this are just a few of thousands—literally, thousands—of studies on the biological effects of EMFs. About 4,000 have been published just on PubMed between 1964 and 2021 alone. The data is not missing. We’re just not talking about it.
To add weight to my arguments.
Ask yourself: why would Lloyd’s of London—one of the world’s most respected insurance underwriters—refuse to underwrite health risks related to wireless technology?
In 2010, Lloyd’s published a report comparing the potential risks of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from mobile phones to those of asbestos. They noted that, like asbestos, EMF litigation could be long and complex, with potential for significant health implications not yet fully understood.
By 2015, Lloyd’s had taken a definitive stance. Their underwriter, CFC Underwriting Limited, introduced an exclusion clause—Exclusion 32—explicitly stating that their policies would not cover any claims “directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” This exclusion has become standard across the market, effectively removing coverage for illnesses caused by continuous long-term non-ionizing radiation exposure, such as that from mobile phone usage.
It’s not just Lloyd’s. Swiss Re, another major reinsurance company, has also highlighted the potential long-term health risks of EMF exposure, particularly with the rollout of 5G technology. Their reports classify EMFs as a “high” emerging risk, drawing parallels to the asbestos crisis in terms of potential liability and long latency periods for health effects to manifest.
If these leading insurers, whose business hinges on accurately assessing risk, are taking such precautions, shouldn’t we be paying closer attention?
Lets now talk about more wide-spread effects.
The effects
I remember watching the film Idiocracy once. It was meant to be a satire—a comedic exaggeration of a society that had slowly dumbed itself down to the point of collapse. But honestly, I did luagh then, I don’t laugh as much now. It hits too close to home. Because when I look around today, especially at how we’re sprinting into this wireless revolution without much thought, it feels like we’re drifting toward that same future. A world of convenience over consciousness. Speed over depth. Constant stimulation, but very little nourishment. And the growing evidence of nervous system functions damage.
It’s like we’re trading higher brain functions for signal strength.
And here’s something that most people don’t realise—but it’s key.
Our bodies are built first and foremost for survival, not for deep thought or creativity. Pumping blood, filtering toxins, moving lymph, balancing hormones—these come before anything else. They’re the foundation. Higher thinking, mood, motivation—those are luxuries in the biological sense. They only thrive when the basics are covered, when the system feels safe and resourced.
But when energy is scarce—when the body is under constant low-grade stress from environmental factors like poor diet, toxic air, noise, overstimulation, and yes, artificial EMFs—it starts cutting costs. Quietly, efficiently. It dials down everything non-essential. Your energy to go out. Your curiosity. Your emotional resilience. Even your ability to stay optimistic or connect deeply with others.
It’s not depression. It’s conservation.
The body is doing what it has to do—protecting the little vitality that’s left. Compensating for the unseen overload. And artificial EMFs are often the invisible layer sitting on top of all the others, tipping the scales from just-manageable to overwhelmed.
Can we observe these effects already?
We don’t need to look far to see the effects of our overstimulated environment. Research indicates that the average human attention span has decreased significantly over the past two decades. In 2004, people could focus on a screen for about 2.5 minutes; by 2023, that duration has dropped to just 44 seconds. This decline isn’t solely due to EMFs, but they contribute to the cumulative environmental stressors affecting our cognitive functions.
You’d think that in an era so obsessed with health tracking, self-optimization, and “wellness,” we’d be doing better. But the numbers tell a different story.
In the UK alone, the past two decades have brought a quiet explosion of neurodegenerative disease. Alzheimer’s deaths have increased by 348%, dementia by 235%, and Parkinson’s by 105%, while most other causes of death—cancer, respiratory failure, circulatory disease—have actually decreased. Between 2001 and 2019, deaths attributed to dementia and Alzheimer’s rose from 9.6% to 12.5% of all registered deaths in England and Wales. And perhaps most disturbingly, “increases in early adult neurological deaths suggest this cannot be solely explained by an aging population.”. While diagnostic criteria for ’cause of death’ may be debated, a key issue remains: medical professionals are increasingly observing a rise in neurodegenerative diseases. In many cases, they do not—or cannot—attribute the cause of death directly to cancer, respiratory, or circulatory conditions.
So what’s going on? We’re supposedly more advanced than ever. We’re eating better (at least that’s what the labels claim), running marathons, meditating with apps. Yet something fundamental is cracking beneath the surface, and medicine is often left scratching its head. We treat symptoms, label syndromes, and make people manageable—but the root causes remain suspiciously off-limits. Why?
Now, let’s zoom out for a second.
In 2023 alone, the world shipped roughly 3.8 billion Wi-Fi-enabled devices. That’s over 10 million per day. Add in smartphones, which are expected to number 18.2 billion globally by 2025, and then factor in Bluetooth gadgets, smart meters, fitness trackers, smart toasters, and all the delightful little IoT gizmos we’ve convinced ourselves we “need,” and we’re talking tens of millions of wireless devices rolling off production lines every single day.
And here’s where the cognitive dissonance becomes almost comedic—if it weren’t so tragic.
We’re told we’re in the middle of a “green revolution.” We’re saving the planet with electric cars, bamboo toothbrushes, and solar-powered garden gnomes. But behind the PR-friendly headlines, we’re building a planetary nervous system that never sleeps, never stops pulsing—an invisible fog of microwave radiation that now saturates our homes, schools, bedrooms, and bodies 24/7.
We’re planting trees and installing 5G towers next to them. And when the birds stop singing, we call it climate change, as if the only environmental threat is carbon. As if EMFs, flickering LEDs, and synthetic light spectra have no impact on flora, fauna, or us.
It’s not very green to burn the nervous systems of living beings just to stream cat videos 0.3 seconds faster.
And so we keep producing. More gadgets. More wireless “solutions.” More things to plug in without wires. Tens of millions of devices, every single day, all radiating. All adding to the invisible soup we live in. And meanwhile, the human brain—the one thing that’s supposed to make sense of it all—is quietly fading out. Losing its ability to focus. To regulate emotion. To regenerate.
And re the “green revolution” – think how many of our planets resources need to be excavated daily, how many rivers polluted. Every “clean” phone, every “sustainable” smart device, every wireless sensor we install to make our homes “eco-efficient” requires the earth to be carved open. Vast quantities of lithium, cobalt, rare earth metals—torn from the crust of this planet every single day. Mountains reduced to wounds. Rivers poisoned with heavy metals. Indigenous land turned to ghost terrain. And emissions. Loads more than your good old combustion engine. Loads more than 100,000 and more people cities.
And for what?
So that our smart fridge can text us when the almond milk is running low?
Is this progress?
What can you do
So what can you actually do to protect yourself?
This is where it gets both simple and radical—because once you understand that the problem is real, the most powerful thing you can do is start making different choices. Not out of panic, but out of clarity. Out of a decision to stop being passive in your own life. To stop being just another endpoint in a network of endless consumption. Stop being a consumer and start on your participant journey.
Here are some of the things I’ve done, and continue to do.
I walk barefoot outside whenever I can. It sounds simple, but connecting directly with the earth helps discharge some of the built-up charge our bodies accumulate in artificial environments. I’ve reduced my mobile phone use drastically. No more scrolling at night. No more “just checking” messages. And yes—I turned off Wi-Fi at home years ago. I use Ethernet cables instead. They work just fine.
We also moved out of the city. I know that’s not an option for everyone, but it changed everything for us. I sleep in a grounded Faraday cage—because I care about how I feel when I wake up. And sleep is very important. We replaced LED and fluorescent lighting with softer, incandescent bulbs. We spend time in nature without gadgets, without notifications, without the digital leash pulling at our attention.
And most importantly: I never stop learning.
I’ve come to understand that there’s no magic behind wireless technology. It’s not some abstract miracle—it’s physics. And physics has rules. If you want faster data transmission and more connected devices, you must increase the density and power of the radiation around us. That’s not an opinion. That’s the deal. Every so-called “upgrade” comes at a biological cost.
Marketing won’t tell you that. Marketing exists to make you believe you need things you’ve never asked for. It’s 99% nonsense. A beautiful, polished illusion designed to keep you clicking, buying, and distracted.
But you can choose differently.
You can start using fibre optics (FTTH), or Li-Fi—internet over light. You can go back to Ethernet cables and wired accessories. You can stop buying wireless “toys” you don’t need. You can choose presence over convenience. Sanity over speed.
You can stop chasing online status and start returning to something real. You can become a participant in your own life—not just a consumer of marketing messages.
It’s not about rejecting all technology. It’s about reclaiming your relationship with it. On your terms. With your eyes open.
And the first step? It’s simply choosing to care. Choosing to ask questions. Choosing to reconnect—with your body, your senses, your instinct—and maybe, with the deeper parts of life we’ve been conditioned to forget.
Side-track to “magic”
Now, I know this is the part where someone usually brings up shungite, pendants, phone stickers, or something called Aura-Soma. I’ve heard it all. And I get it—when you’re desperate for relief, you’ll try anything. And there’s nothing wrong with exploring. But it’s important to separate what’s grounded from what’s just good branding.
Let’s start with shungite. There’s one study on rats that showed some improvement when the animals were completely shielded in a Faraday cage made with shungite—a conductive material. That makes sense. It was acting like proper EMF shielding, not a magic rock in the corner of the room. But that doesn’t mean a little shungite pyramid on your desk or a bar in your pocket is going to do anything. That’s wishful thinking disguised as action.
As for stickers, pendants, and so-called “polarisers”—they’ve been tested too. One study showed they had no measurable effect on reducing EMF impact. None. The physics just isn’t there. No matter how nice the packaging is or how beautiful the words in the brochure, it’s not likely to change what’s actually happening to your cells when you’re bathing in high-frequency radiation.
Aura-Soma? As of now, there’s no available research. It may have emotional or symbolic value for some people, and I won’t dismiss that—sometimes ritual matters. But from a biological standpoint, we have no real data.
Now, to stay a little open-minded: there is some interesting research into devices aimed at mitigating geopathic stress. That’s a whole other rabbit hole—because geopathic stress is a force we can’t reliably measure with standard instruments. And yet, people do report improvements in vitality when it’s addressed. It’s strange, hard to pin down, but it’s not without some evidence. So I don’t throw the whole lot out. But I don’t confuse personal meaning with proven protection either.
In the end, the question I always come back to is simple: does it help reduce exposure, or does it help you feel more in control while everything stays exactly the same? There’s a big difference between actual shielding and placebo comfort. Only one of them shields your biology. The other might make you feel good, but will not stop the exposure to man-made EMFs.
Resources
- https://theemfguy.com
- https://www.emfsa.co.za
- https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- https://www.yshield.com/en/
- https://emfbusters.pl (IN POLISH, BUT YOU CAN USE GOOGLE TRANSLATE)
- https://emf-protection.co.uk
And a presentation I did on behalf of FCA Association back in the Heal Scotland Festival.
❤️ Stay healthy, on high vitality levels and see you next time lovely people. ❤️
Gustaw Fit Blog 
Leave a comment